WELCOME TO

 

Buy~Sell~Broker~Locate~Appraise~Consult~Renovate

 

Office(210)340-5288

Cell(210)685-3793

Why a Mooney?

Mooney Models

What We Offer

What Others Say

About Us

Flight Freedom

Wing Tips

YOUR HELP NEEDED

Contact Us

Please go to the hunger site above and sign up for their daily email reminder to click to give food to the needy at no charge to you!

 

Catch the Mooney Enthusiasm at Coast to Coast Aircraft Sales

Your Source FOR EVERYTHING MOONEY and MORE!

You need THIS and THIS (Package price available)

ATTENTION ALL MOONEY OWNERS: see the MOONEYLAND BLOG PAGE for information as to why a majority of Mooneys may not be airworthy and how to simply check for that and the simple remedy you can take care of yourself.

LET 'EM KNOW YOU FLY A MOONEY! NEW MOONEY GRAPHIC ONLY $12.00 SHIPPED! Heavy duty long lasting 8" graphic vinyl decal for your car, office, mirrors, home, etc. Professional quality GRAPHIC easy to install with professional results. AVAILABLE in BLACK or WHITE (please specify with order), order as many as you'd like with free shipping! LET 'EM KNOW BABY! get one free with each $25.00 donation to MOONEYLAND's WEBSITE, or order your MOONEY graphic with DONATION button and indicate the order is for the MOONEY GRAPHIC (click Donate Button below.....Or send payment to our address at page bottom)

Differences In Early Mooney Models

                         

   

Some relatively "unknown" Mooneys to look at as well....Enjoy! BTW, be sureto see the Mooney Video at the end of this page! Thanks Mr. Mooney! new!

red_plane_2.gif - (2K)

Meanwhile, think about signing a petition that adds your comments to forward to Mooney Aircraft that we want to see an addition of the resurrection of the Mooney 301 pressurized six place aircraft that will begin as an addition to Mooney models in a pressurized cabin that will eventually lead to the Mooney-Jet! Who would we trust on an airframe designed by Mooney than a pure jet Mooney Aeroplane? I am at the head of that list to help insure the future of Mooney Aircraft! Send me your support on such a Mooney venture so that I can forward your concerns to Mooney direct!

Don't let Aviation pass you by. Get involved. Mooney needs a future if they are to survive and they deserve to survive if they simply join where the future of aviation is on its way to!

Okay, I'm no expert on the Mite So you'll have to contact Boyd Maddox in Houston for that, but I do know you can just about reach the engine in flight to fine tune it! :o)

Original M20 Body stretched two more times over the years.

Fixed Gear M20D (Mooney Master) Same as M20C otherwise.

M20E (Same airframe as the M20C)

M20F (Executive) Became the 201 in 1977 (M20 stretched 10")

M20J (201)

M22 Mustang (Pressurized 5 Place Seating!) See article below..

A-2, M-5 1930 = Similar to A-1 with 125hp Kinner B-5; span: 36'6" length: 21'0" load: 1000#. POP: 1 [X463N], flown by Mooney on a non-stop transcontinental attempt from Glendale CA to Long Island NY as a promotional effort, but only made it to Fort Wayne IN when his fuel pump failed.

M17 (Culver V) 19?? = ClwM; 90hp Continental C-90. Featured a one-piece flap underneath the fuselage and linked to the elevator in a system Mooney called "Simpli-Fly."

Gladys Davis' 1950 Powder Puff Derby entry [N122CX] (William T larkins)

M18-C aka "Wee Scotsman" 1949 (803) = 65hp Continental A-65-8 or -12; span: 26'11" length: 17'9" load: 270# v: 140/125/43 range: 390. $2,325.

M19 1950 = M18-L modified as a mini-fighter, complete with two .30 machine guns and rocket launchers. POP: 1 as a demonstrator for the AF, but no interest was expressed

 

M10 Cadet aka Mooney-Coupe 1969 = Single-tail version of Alon Aircoupe. 90hp Continental C-90-16F; span: 30'0" length: 20'8" load: 438# v: 118/110/46 range: 555 ceiling: 15,500'. $8,295-8,995; deluxe version $10,340

(Japanese Mooney named AEROSTAR)

MU-2 = Licensed production or Japanese Mitsubishi MU-2 twin.

(There WAS actually a genuine TWIN MOONEY built based on the M20 airframe but later scrapped). That was an UGLY airplane and if anyone knows where I can get a photo of the Twin Mooney,  please let me know... (Thanks to Lance W. who sent in these photos of the M20-Twin) Check out the awkward dorsal fin!

     

    

Twin Mooney taxi and in flight photos courtesy of Paul Kehner at Mooney Aircraft Company

Click for larger version  Mooney M.22 Mustang / OE-KGE

An old Friend of mine, Frenchman; Marc Mosier (Peppy Le Pieu)_is a pilot who often makes his living transporting aircraft across the Atlantic. At one point after delivering a plane to Europe, he bought at Mooney Mustang and crossed back over with it. He liked the plane very much, but was quoted by Flying Magazine that it was a "macho-man's plane" as it took his foot to close the cowl flaps! The Mustang has yet to have a single AD affecting the airframe! There were about 31 of these built from1967-1970, and while the first one's built cost $33,950 finishing up in 1970 at $46,320, the COST for Mooney to build each one was over $65,000! Long story, but the market would not handle over $65K at the time, thus the demise of the way-ahead-of-its-time (MOONEY ON STEROIDS) the Mooney Mustang!

 

1969 Mooney Mustang M-22
SPECIFICATIONS
Engine make/model: Lycoming TIO-541 (AIA)
Max horsepower for takeoff@rpm: 310@2575
TBO hours: 1600
Fuel Type: 100LL
Propeller type/diameter (in.): Hartzell CS/80 two-blade
Landing gear type: Tri/Retr.
Gross weight - max ramp (lbs): 3680
Gross weight - max takeoff (lbs): 3680
Max landing weight (lbs.): 3680
Empty weight, std. (lbs.): 1255
Equipment weight, as tested (lbs.): 2580
Useful load, std. (lbs.): 1255
Useful load, equipped (lbs.): 1100
fuel capacity (U.S. gals.): 95
Usable fuel capacity (U.S. gals.): 92
Payload (full fuel, 92 U.S. gals.): 548 lbs.
Oil capacity (U.S. qts.): 14
Wingspan (flt.): 35
Overall length (ft.): 27
Height: 9 ft. 10 in.
Wing area (sq. ft.): 167.3
Wing loading (lbs./sq. ft.): 22
Power loading (lbs./hp.): 12
Wheel track (ft.): 11
Wheel base: 8 ft. 3 in.
Tire size: 6.00 x 6 (mains), 6.00 x 6 (nose)
Seating capacity: 5
Cabin doors: 1
Cabin doors width (in.): 34
Cabin doors height (in.): 35
Cabin doors max opening (in.): 38
Cabin length (in.): 118
Cabin width (in.): 42
Cabin height (in.): 49
Baggage capacity (lbs./cu. ft.): 270/25
PERFORMANCE
Max level speed @ 24,000 ft. (kts./mph): 223/256
Standard day @ 24,000 ft.:
Best power - cruise speed (kts./mph):
75% power: 199/229
65% power: 186/214
Best economy - cruise speed (kts./mph):
73% power: 197/226
65% power: 185/215
Max range @ 24,000 ft. (w/ opt. fuel, 45-min. reserve) (nm/sm):
Best power
75% power: 723/832
65% power: 805/926
Best economy
75% power: 837/962
65% power: 907/1043
Fuel consumption (gph):
Best power
75% power: 18.6
67% power: 16.7
Best economy
75% power: 16.1
65% power: 14.1
Estimated endurance
(65%) (hrs.):
5.01
Vs - 3680 lbs. (kts./mph): 66/76
Vso - 3680 lbs. (kts./mph): 60/69
Best rate of climb @ gross (fpm): 1125
Service ceiling (max certified) (ft.): 24,000
Takeoff ground roll (ft.): 1142
Takeoff over 50-ft. obstacle (ft.): 2079
Landing ground roll (ft.): 958
Landing over 50-ft. obstacle (ft.): 1549
 

Did you know that there was once a PRESSUREIZED MOONEY called the 301? (Note the similarities to the TBM airframe) Thank the former French owners for its demise. The six place 301 would probably have been the hottest seller on TODAY'S NEW AIRCRAFT MARKET!!! ARE YOU LISTENING MOONEY?

Mooney 301 (TMB700)

The original Mooney 301 brochure. Target price: $955,000.

In December of 1973, just three months after buying Mooney Aircraft, Republic Steel Corporation hired Roy LoPresti as Vice President of Engineering. Among the many projects developed by Mooney during the next years, the design of a pressurized single was determined to be necessary. In 1980, in response to the Cessna P210 already in production, and to the pending offerings from Beech and Piper (in development) Mooney began design work on the M30 which was designated the MX-1 in engineering.

The M30 was to be powered by a Lycoming TSIO-540 producing 360 horsepower. It would have a top speed of 262 knots, which was equal to 301 mph, and because Mooney was into using speed as a name - it became the Mooney 301.

The M30 was a completely new design for the Mooney engineering department with no similarity to any M20 previously produced. It had high aspect ratio, natural laminar flow wings, and large-span, Fowler type flaps which covered 90 percent of the wings trailing edge. Roll control was to be spoilers augmented by small ailerons on each wing. It would have a service ceiling of 25,000 feet and a cabin pressurized to 5 psig. This would give a 9000-foot cabin altitude at FL250.

N301MX now belongs to an Aviat Husky . . .

Since the design was so different, Mr. LoPresti brought his own engineers in to do the design work, separating the M20 engineers from those working on the 301. This did not create peace and harmony within the engineering staff!

The first flight was on April 7, 1983, and production was scheduled to begin in 1985.

In July 1984 Republic Steel was bought by Ling-Temco-Vought (LTV Corporation) of Dallas Texas. LTV immediately ordered Republic Steel to dispose of Mooney Aircraft. After a short (6 week) ownership by a group if investors from Minnesota called the Morrison Company, Mooney was again sold. This time to a consortium made up of investors from France lead by Alec Couvelaire (a Mooney dealer in Paris) and Armand Rivard (owner of Lake Aircraft).

Production of the Mooney 301, first planned for 1985 was delayed until 1986, and then delayed indefinitely after the purchase by the French.

Because the aircraft was still in its early stages of engineering development; there were areas that continued to need attention. The prototype was about 200 pounds over its projected weight. This, coupled with the lack of some aerodynamic improvements that were incomplete at this time, made the airplane slower than desired. Although the engineers at Mooney were working on these issues, the French management decided that 260 knots was too slow for the projected market. Mr. Couvelaire thought that the buyers would demand something close to 300 knots cruise speed. It was his feeling that Mooney did not have the resources (either financial or technical) to engineer and produce a single engine, turbine powered, pressurized aircraft in 1985.

Alec initiated a joint venture between Mooney Aircraft in Kerrville and the Socata Division of Aerospatiale in France. This joint venture was to become the TBM700, and proposed a cruise speed of 300 knots true, a service ceiling of 30,000 feet, and a Pratt & Whitney Canada PT6A-64 powerplant.

The TBM700 was the first "purpose built" pressurized, single-engine, turboprop ever designed.

In 1987, all the engineering data for the M30 was delivered to the engineers in Tarbes France, the home of Socata. In addition to the design information, the only flying 301 prototype was disassembled and shipped to France for examination.

In July 1988 the first prototype was shown in Tarbes. By now the consortium had grown to be Mooney, Aerospatiale, and a group of investors from Finland called Valmet. Each would provide operating capitol, although Aerospatiale was heavily funded by loans from the French government. In addition, Mooney and Socata would each build sub-assemblies and major component structures, which would be assembled on two parallel production lines in the U.S. and France.

In 1989, Mooney purchased from the bank, the former Million-Air facility located on San Antonio International Airport. This facility was to be the showcase for Mooney Aircraft with sales; service and delivery all located in a new, separate location from the factory. This building was also to house the newly formed TBM North America, Inc. which was the sales and service arm of the joint venture in the U.S. Also, the new facility was large enough to allow for the assembly line for the TBM700, and keep it apart from the regular Mooney production line in Kerrville. I suspect this was a requirement from the French Aerospatiale which was also building a Mooney rival - the Trinidad.

Each member of the consortium was to provide one-third of the projected $20 million development cost. In 1989 Valmet dropped out having failed to raise the necessary capitol from its investors. This left Mooney (1/3) and Aerospatiale (2/3) as partners, and paved the way for much disagreement. Although in 1989, Alec Couvelaire and Pierre Gautier from Socata announced a formal commitment to production, by the summer of 1989 Mooney had been dropped from the partnership, and the TBM700 became completely a product of Socata. Although Socata design utilized their own ideas for the shape of the fuselage and wings, they did use the engineering provided by Kerrville for the flight control operation. This is noted by the large span, single-slot Fowler flap with spoilers and small ailerons found on the TBM700.

 

Split Fowler flaps, spoiler on Mooney 301. Mooney model number was for targeted 300-mph cruise.

The M30 (301 prototype) was returned to Kerrville where it sat in the corner of engineering for many years. Finally, after all of the lawsuits from the Mooney/Socata break-up were settled, it was destroyed. Because the design had so many flaws, it was decided that is should be scrapped, so the wings were cut-off, and Tom Bowen gave it to an A&P school in Abilene Texas.

Although it never made it past one flying prototype, parts of the Mooney M30, 301 are flying today in every TBM700. In fact, you could say that the TBM700 was the brainchild of Alec Couvelaire and the engineers at Mooney Aircraft. By the way, TB stands for Tarbes, France and M is for Mooney. The 700 is the flat-rated shaft horsepower of the PT6A-64 engine.

My thanks go to Brant Dahlfors, former VP Marketing and Sales at Mooney and at TBM North America (currently with Bombardier Learjet), Larry Ball and his book "Those Remarkable Mooneys", and Tom Bowen at MAC.

Keep your airspeed up, and "Don't do nuthin' dumb!"

Trey Hughes

 

TBM700, nee Mooney 301, uses a 700hsp Pratt & Whitney engine

Mooney 301 Specifications:

Cabin: 6-place, pressurized
Top speed: 301mph / 262 knots / 484kmh
Cruise, max altitude, 75% power: 270 mph / 235 knots / 435 kmh
Fuel consumption at cruise: 19.7 gph / 74.6 lph
Fuel capacity: 100 gallons / 379 liters
Range, at cruise, 45 min. reserve: 1,134 miles / 986 nm / 1,825 km
Max. certified altitude: 25,000' (7,620 m)
Rate of climb: 1,400 fpm / 7.1 m/sec
Gross weight: 4,000 lb / 1,814 kg
Useful load: 1,600 lb / 726 kg
Wing span: 37' 0" / 11.3 m
Length: 29' 8" / 9.0 m
Height: 9' 10" / 3.0 m
 

M301cap.jpg - 8383 Bytes

 

Promotional cap from the Mooney 301 marketing program

 

     

The TBM 700 first flew in 1988 and French certification followed in 1990. The TBM 700 was designed together with MOONEY but Mooney withdrew from the project (yeah right..) shortly after certification. In the designation TBM, TB stands for Tarbes, the city in France in which Socata is located, the "M" stands for MOONEY (the intital "M" was kept in the model designation even though Mooney was never involved in the production of the airplane). The TBM 700 also comes in a cargo variant. The TBM 700 uses a Pratt & Whitney PT6A-64 engine delivering 700shp.

The TBM 850 is a more powerful version of the TBM 700 using a Pratt & Whitney PT6A-66D engine flat-rated at 850hp. This extra power gives it a higher cruising speed than the TBM 700 models. The cruise speed now comes close to that of light business jets which are more expensive to operate than a single engined turboprop, hence the slogan Jet Performance at Turboprop Economy. The price of a "typically equipped" TBM 850 in 2006 is listed as 2.8 million US dollars. The outside appearance of the TBM 850 has remained the same as that of the TBM 700.          (Socata bills its TBM-850 turboprop as the fastest production single-engine aircraft available. The 850 is a larger, faster version of the TBM-700).

As of the spring of 2007, over 370 TBMs have been produced.

Specifications given are for the TBM 850 model.

 General characteristics

  • Crew: 1 or 2 pilots
  • Passengers: 4 to 6 (including one passenger in the cockpit if there is no co-pilot)
  • Powerplant: 1 x Pratt & Whitney PT6A-66D with 850hp
  • Wing span: 12,68m (41,6ft)
  • Length: 10,65m (35ft)
  • Height: 4,36m (14,3ft)
  • Empty weight: 2,132kg
  • Loaded maximum: 3,370kg (3,354kg max take-off)

 Performance

  • Long Range Cruise speed: 252kts
  • Maximum Cruise speed: 320kts
  • Ceiling: 31.000ft (maximum certified altitude)
  • Climb rate: 2380 ft/min
  • Time to Climb to 26,000 ft: 15 min
  • Range: 2870km (1550nm) (1,784 mi)

 

 

 The Mooney M20-L PFM (Porsche Mooney) was a wonderful idea and the greatest advancement in general aviation since the removal of wing struts (sorry 172 owners). Not only did the plane have the aviation version of the Porsche 911 engine (220 HP), but it was all electric and no vacuum system aboard. It used an electric 3 buss 2 battery system to drive everything aboard including the most expensive and outright beautiful and special operating instruments where each instrument looked like a fine Swiss watch makers' result. My understanding at the time was that to replace those instruments would run in the neighborhood of $16,000.00 which was a lot of geetum back in 1988. There were a total of 40 PFM's made in 1988 and 1 in 1989 before Mooney called it quits for the PFM. There were several reasons for its demise and a loss of MILLIONS in development costs for Mooney as well as Porsche. Some of those reasons were COST: Not wanting to sell the plane in the RED as was the case with the Pressurized Mooney M-22 Mustang, Mooney sold the PFM for about $190K on average out the door price while the much faster 252 was selling for about 5 grand less, and after all, it’s all about speed right? Some of the other factors were the composite prop which had a blade life of 1500 hours and a heavy cost of replacement blades as well as an automatic $5800.00 (at the time) to overhaul the gear reduction system, again each 1500 hours. It was to my thinking a good trade-off as Porsche had a program to do a FREE top overhaul at about 1,000 hours and a guarantee to sell you a BRAND NEW engine for only $20,000.00 once your old one reached the 2,000 hour TBO. Porsche was in the process to up the TBO to 4,000 hours once they could prove to the FAA what they already knew, that it was a very strong, bullet proof engine! Porsche was also in the process of upping the horse power of that engine to over 250 and put a turbo charger on it. That would have really been a GOER! Proper marketing did not take place in my opinion of this fabulous airplane that I for one was much saddened to see it go. The PFM was about the easiest HIGH PERFORMANCE airplane to ever take to the sky. There was no MIXTURE nor PROPELLER control! There was just this sexy POWER SLIDE BAR that you would push right in as fast as you wanted and linkage (not computerization as many thought) would regulate the mixture and prop setting. Very ingenious! And because the 911 style engine had its own cooling fan, there was never a worry of shock cooling that engine. You could easily and worry free pull off all of the power for descent if you wanted, so “SLAM DUNK” approaches were made much easier than any previous Mooney ever made. While I am not the most avid fan of the “super stretch” Mooney body (12" more than the 252, and 22" total stretch over the original M20 airframe) that ALL new Mooney use today, the PFM was the first to get that body. The windows were the same size as the 252 instead of the much larger viewing area used today, but as I said the body is the same. Because of the shape of the engine, the PFM’s cowl was more streamlined looking than any other Mooney, in fact it looked much like a Turbine engine was under the bonnet. I loved flying the PFM and found it to exceed the specs in the owners manual and even though it had the super stretch, heavier body, the performance to me was more than admirable on not much more horsepower than the 201. Cruising in the low to mid 160 KT range was an easy achievement and my feeling was that when (if) the turbo version would have made it to fruition, we would have had a 200 KT Porsche. I miss that engine; it was as easy to start as any automobile and the sound if the PFM taxiing by was pure Porsche 911! The yokes, the instrumentation, the fit and finish, the engine, the sound, the flying qualities………….man I miss that Model and I miss what it could have become; so next time you start complaining that today’s aircraft engines are actually 1940’s design, remember the (ahead of its time) ENGINE DESIGN we all let get away!

The Newer Mooneys are based on the stretched once again original PFM airframe. Stretching the airframe once again somewhat took away from the legendary Mooney strength apparently as maneuvering speed was reduced from 134 kts Va speed of the original M20 body to 118-124 Va of the newest models depending on whom you ask. Don't worry however, any Mooney is about twice as strong as the competition! YOU CAN'T BREAK THIS AIRFRAME! Eat your heart out Bonanza!

  

How Many of you would be interested in purchasing the fully aerobatic "TIGER/PREDATOR" short M20 Body with super high performance motor? Email me so that I can forward the POLL to Mooney Aircraft Company, and who knows, they may produce it if enough people were interested in it!

The Tiger, formally known as the Mooney Predator, was created to compete for the Air Force’s

primary trainer contract in 1989-1990. Mooney hoped to win the contract, use the government’s cash

to certify the aircraft, and then develop a civilian version. The aircraft wasn’t selected for the

contract, however, and languished for the next five years in the back of a Mooney engineering test

hangar. Stripped of its engine, canopy and cowling, the two-seater plane was left for dead.

Enter Tom Bowen, then Mooney’s vice president of engineering. After examining the flight data,

Bowen felt the airplane’s quick spin ability would make the Predator an ideal aerobatic aircraft for

Mooney. He and a small group of colleagues committed themselves to rebuilding it. In 1996, the

extensive refurbishment process began. A 300 hp Continental IO-550 engine filled the empty engine

compartment. A new prop and canopy was fitted. The original red-and-white paint scheme was

replaced by black-and-orange stripes, creating the appearance of a Bengal tiger. The Tiger roared

into the 1996 Oshkosh Air Show and became an immediate crowd favorite. The cat was ready to

prowl the skies.

Mooney began preparing the Tiger for the category of aerobatic operation. However, the airplane

wasn’t certified. It would take at least three years and approximately $5 million to reach certification

requirements. Due to the high cost, Mooney refocused its attention to other projects and once again

the little plane was caged back at the hangar.

This sleek aircraft combines benefits from several Mooney models – a short body from the M20C

and M20E, a tail from the M22 Pressurized Mustang and the M20J 201 wing. A canopy replaces the single door and sticks

substitute for regular controls. The big Continental engine makes the Tiger fast. It reaches speeds

up to 180 ktas, only 10 ktas less than Mooney’s Ovation2 GX. A spartan interior with no insulation

gives the aircraft a race-car sound.

“Even as a bare-bones aircraft, the Tiger maintains the famous Mooney stability,” said David

Copeland, Mooney Airplane Company vice president of sales and marketing. “Design and

engineering efforts such as those taken with the Tiger have helped further our work – and success –

with other models, such as Mooney’s new Ovation2 GX and Bravo GX models.”

Tiger statistics

Maximum speed 180 ktas

Rate of climb 1,400 ft./min.

Maximum altitude 20,000 ft.

Stall speed 56 ktas

Take-off distance to 50 feet 1,500 ft.

Landing distance over 50 feet 2,100 ft.

Range 450 nm

Endurance 3 hrs.

Wing span 36’1”

Max gross take-off weight 2,900 pounds

Aircraft empty weight 1,916 pounds

Useful load 984 pounds

Usable fuel 471 pounds

78.6 USG in two wing tanks

We should probably have added this information long ago to our website at Mooneyland, as we get asked these questions a lot from non Mooney types wondering what the differences are between B, C, D, E, F, G, J, and K models, so let us review this and other engine information together.

I will limit this discussion to non wooden models only.  Most Mooney’s save the pressurized Mustang are M20’s.

The B model was available for only one year, and that was 1961.  That model was a good Mooney, but had a tendency of getting in to a flat spin when spun, in fact, the Mooney test pilot had to bail out of that model when spin testing.  After a C.G. change, that potential problem was alleviated.  There is nothing wrong with the B model so long as it was not spun.  It had the same engine/prop combination as the subsequent C models, which is the 180 H.P. carbureted Lycoming engine.  That engine has been known to go up to 4000 SMOH on some flight school aircraft.  This engine is probably the most “bulletproof” engine of its class. 

However, because it is carbureted, it is subject to carb-ice, so, it has a carb heat knob to check on run-up, as well as when ever you suspect carb-icing.  Both the O-360 and IO-360 Lycoming's have a 2000 hour TBO, but you should not exceed that by more than about ten percent, in the E's F's and J's, even if still running great, whereby the C's 0-360 can sail past TBO if taken care of and watched closely once past TBO.  TBO is based on an average of all uses of a particular engine, and is not mandated to overhaul at TBO unless operated on FAA's part 135.  There are just too many variables, which help determine when an engine should get an overhaul.

Because the O-360 is carbureted and not fuel injected as the 200 horse power version of the same basic engine, it tends to run a bit rougher than the fuel injected version, which distributes fuel exactly to each cylinder, making it a smoother running engine.  The C model will give you a pretty good shudder when you shut it down vs. the E, which shuts down a bit smoother.

Many people prefer the C model, as it is the most simple engine/airframe, and normally less expensive than the E model, which has 20 more horse power and smoother running engine.  There is no difference in airframe and prop between the C and E model Mooney other than the engine and horse power.  There is nothing inherently wrong with either model, as they both do their respective missions with speed and efficiency.  Amazing speed and efficiency actually.

The D model was originally a fixed gear version of the C model with the same horsepower, but most have been converted to retractable gear, thus when you see C/D Mooney, it was formally the fixed gear which was converted, making it about the same aircraft.

If you were to do a drag race between the C and E model at full power, you would see about a 6-8 knot difference favoring the E model with more horse power obviously.  In the real world, however, most C model types will fly the C averaging 2350 and 24 Squared, as the faster you turn it, the more it vibrates as a rule, conversely, many people run the E models at 25 squared because the faster you turn the injected engine, the smoother it seems, so with that, you will see about low to mid 140 knot range in the C vs. 150-155 KTAS in the E model.  You will really appreciate the E model’s smoothness when flying at high altitudes where you can run up to 2700RPM smoothly to get the more horse power needed in a normally aspirated engine, so like I said, in real life, the E out performs the C, but because of the potential longevity of the properly maintained engine, the hourly cost of operation can be substantially lower than it’s close cousin, should you choose to keep it running well beyond TBO as many do with this engine.

One other difference between the two is the fact that the E model has what is called “ram air”.  This is a “poor man’s” turbo charger.  You would normally open the ram air above 5,000’, in clear, clean, not IMC air where 75%power is no longer possible.  You may pick up as much as 1-1/2” additional manifold pressure using the ram air.  What is ram air?  There is a small rectangular door that you can open to bypass the air filter, and inject ram air directly in to the engine in a straight line through a venturi, which will allow air to reach the injector directly without having to go around any corners as when through the filter, thus more dense air enters the engine more efficiently creating more horsepower at the higher altitudes.  Flying through IMC with the ram air opened can cause an engine failure due to super freezing the air through the venturi, because of the increase in moisture as found in the clouds.  In any event, remember to shut the ram air when entering IMC.

You should not use it on the ground unless you can be certain that the air is very clean and you will not pick up dust on take off.  The only time you would consider using the ram air in that situation is when taking off at a very high altitude airport with high density altitude where the difference in horse power may make the difference in getting off the ground or not.  Rule of thumb however, is to remember not to use it on the ground, and only in clean, clear air.

If you lower the landing gear while forgetting to shut the ram air off, you will get a very bright orange light to remind you to shut it off.

The F model Mooney, also known as the Executive was stretched ten inches, with about5” more rear seat leg room and the rest in the baggage compartment.  It uses the same engine as the E model, the IO-360-A1A.  “I” standing for Injected.  The 180 horse power engine is the O-360, non injected, or carbureted.  Both engines have 360 cubic inches, which for a 4 cylinder engine, is a huge capacity.  The pistons are huge in those engines.  Many automobile V-8 engines do not have that much capacity.

So, you get more length in the F model, as well as 64 gallons usable fuel, vs. 52gallons usable in the C and E models.  Of course, the F model has a higher gross weight and a longer airframe, so you will burn more fuel in the F model.  It all varies with altitude and load, but expect about 9-9-1/2 GPH in the E model, about half a gallon less in the C, and about 1-1/2 GPH more in the F model.  The F model will fly about the same speed as the C model, even though it has 20 more horsepower, however, you get a bit more range due to the extended fuel capacity.

Strength of the tail feathers was increased in the F model to handle the longer, heavier load by using larger and corrugated skins on the elevator and rudder as opposed to more simple to construct flat skinned short bodies.  The F model also has a heavier feel to it, a bit more stable on approach, but also a bit more nose heavy and a slightly lower roll rate.

The G model uses the C model’s lower horse powered engine, with the same lower fuel capacity of the C, and the same non corrugated tail feathers.  Some consider the G model to be a bit underpowered while others really like the G’s extra room with their favorite O-360 engine.

You can fly with 4 people after checking the load weight in all M-20’s, but if your trips usually fill 4 seats, you may want to consider the F model size for a bit more leg room.  However, I have loaded the short bodies with 4 people, and once they are in, seem to have as much leg room as your average airliner, and just a bit more in the stretched body.

The short bodies have lighter, more crisp handling however, than the stretched versions, but tend to “fishtail” a bit more in some types of turbulence, but nothing as bad as the V tail Bonanza however.  You can usually alleviate that by placing both feet on the rudders.  The short body Mooney’s remain the most popular with economical buyers.

The F model is virtually the same airframe as the 201 or J model.  Same fuel capacity and same horsepower.  However, all pre J models have individual dual mags, while the J model uses what is called, the single dual mag.  Both mags are housed within one housing.  While they have proven to be reliable, there are a few, fairly rare things that can go wrong to short out the entire dual mag rendering you “magless” and consequently, engine powerless.

The F model became the J model with some factory speed mods and a bit of LoPrestimagic.  I say magic because if you were to install the same mods on the earlier F model as the J had, you still won’t go as fast in the F as the J for some reason in my experience.  Weird huh?  Suffice to say that all Mooney’s have some magic in them.  It’s a wonder to go as fast as Mooney’s can go for the horsepower, but that’s the Mooney mystique.

The early J models also had ram air, but the gain of M.P. was only about half to ¾inch gain, as the entire induction system was improved with that model.  Later J models like the MSE had eliminated ram air, and yet were the fastest J models.

The 201 or J model was the first production aircraft to go one mile per hour per horsepower on the test aircraft.  In real life, the early J models would fly at about the same speed as the lighter, shorter E model, about 155 knots optimum speed, but doing so in the longer, bit more comfortable (to rear seat passenger) stretched body as in the J. Widths are nearly the same on all models, which is wider than even Bonanza’s and the Piper PA-28series……..surprise!!!!  So much for the “tight” Mooney myth.  You simply sit a bit lower, as in a sports car for instance, and have the necessary amount, but not more head room than you need which translates in to drag outside the plane.  Personally, I love the feeling of being a part of the machine, and Mooney gives you that feeling just like a fine sports car.

The K model, or 231/252 airframe is the same basic airframe as the F and J models.  The elevator has an extended tab to help compensate for the longer, heavier six cylinder Continental engine which is turbo charged.  You have 210turbo'd horsepower available, and up to 220 in the late 252 called the Encore.  You should expect to see speeds of up to 225 MPH at the higher altitudes in the K model, more in the 252 K model, and more yet in the Encore.  Fuel capacity is more also.  About 76 gallons usable in the K series.  However, you can expect to burn between 12 and 14 GPH at cruise in the K models, depending on altitude, load, and flight conditions.

About half of the 1800 TBO Continental’s require top overhauls at about half life expectancy.  The difference is how the plane is flown and at what altitudes.  The higher they run (up to 24,000’ service ceiling” the hotter they run, and thus, the more likelihood of needing a top half way through TBO.  There seems to be little difference in longevity whether you have the original GB vs. the LB, and even MB engines.  Plan not to exceed TBO with these engines in any event.

On the upside, the six cylinder engine is easier to start, and runs smoother and quieter than the 4 banger brethren.

The 201, 231, and 252 were named after the test aircraft’s top speed, down low, full throttle, and mostly a stripped aircraft, yet to have the weight of radio’s and the drag of antenna’s.  However, the 252 production aircraft, can really attain that speed in MPH on production aircraft, and just may be the best Mooney overall to come out of the factory.  Downside is the acquisition prices, yet they remain a great deal speed for speed on the market.

All Mooney’s are basically hand built and vary in both directions from plane to plane.  Proper rigging also plays a significant role in the speed of any Mooney.

What all of these Mooney’s have in common, is the brilliant design of Al Mooney& company, as well as the legendary strength and the near fool proof and unbreakable airframe.  They all share that wonderful steel tubing “roll cage” that surrounds the passenger compartment.  The fact that all Mooney’s have that wonderful, but heavy (80+lb.)  “roll cage” to protect you, makes any Mooney a wonderful buy on today’s market.

The turbo TLS Bravo as well as the normally aspirated Ovation are much different aircraft than the ones mentioned above.  In 1988, Mooney saw fit to once again stretch the Mooney fuselage with the introduction of the PFM Porsche powered Mooney.  This additional stretch made these Mooney’s have a much different feel than the earlier versions of the M-20 airframe, but we’ll leave that for a future examination.

It is our hope that this article helps you understand the basic differences between the various Mooney models.  Hey, buy anyone you wish, just be sure to buy a MOONEY!  There is nothing out there that can match them overall for speed and efficiency, and in my opinion, safety in passenger protection, and if you want the real skinny on these remarkable aircraft, don’t listen to the rumors of non Mooney types.  Ask a Mooney owner next time you see one on the ramp.  You’ll get an entirely differing perspective.  Most Mooney pilot/owners can indeed be affectionately referred to as “Mooniacs”.  It only takes one flight to convert most to love this stable, reasonably docile and super efficient brand of speedsters.

Fly safe,

Richard Zephro

Pressurized six pax MOONEY 301

The following table of Mooney models through the TLS is below and was reprinted from the Mooney Events website in which we at Mooneyland aided them on their research to include this information on their site.

When printing these tables, "landscape" mode is preferred, as they are 750 pixels wide.

A: average retail price, including popular options

Year Model Serial # Description No. built Factory price
1948 M18 Mite 02 to 12 25hp Crosley auto engine -- later converted to Lycoming 65hp O-145. Single place. Mite features listed here at Dave Rutherford's Mitesite.
Mite #1 was N3199K, now hanging at Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC.
Mite #3 was N3159K, now at Sun 'n Fun Museum in Florida.
11 $1,995
1949 M18L Mite 02 to 67 Lycoming 0-145-B2. Single place. Michael Bolinger's N246MM. Early Mite panel. 66 $2,795
1950 M18L Mite 68 to 82 Lycoming 0-145-B2. Single place.. 15 $2,795
1950 M18C Mite 201 to 240 Continental A65-12 or -8. Single place. 40 $2,965
1951 M18LA Mite 101 to 114 Lycoming 0-145-B2. Gross weight increase from 780lb. to 850 lb. Maneuvering, max structural cruising, flaps extended speeds increased to match M-18C Mite. Single place. Photo of N60MM. 14 $2,965
1951 M18C Mite 241 to 249 Continental A65-12 or -8. Single place. 9 $2,965
1952 M18LA Mite 115 to 135 Lycoming 0-145-B2. Single place. 21 $2,995
1952 M18C Mite 250 to 277 Continental A65-12 or -8. Single place. Christopher Byrd's N4075V. 28 $2,965
1953 M18LA Mite 136 to 145 Lycoming 0-145-B2. Also known as "Wee Scotsman." Single place. 10 $2,840 - $3,029
1953 M18C Mite 278 to 299 Continental A65-12 or -8. Also known as "Wee Scotsman." Single place. Steve McGuire's restored N85PM was the first aircraft produced in 1953. 22 $2,965